Giáo viên cho 5 câu MCQ lượng giá trước và sau khi dạy 1 chuyên đề. Giải thích việc lượng giá đó bằng tiếng anh và phân tích ưu khuyết điểm của PP giảng dạy đó.
Explanation of Using MCQs for Pre- and Post-Lesson Evaluation
A. Pre-lesson Evaluation:
Before teaching the topic, the teacher administers 5 MCQs to assess students’ prior knowledge. This helps identify their baseline understanding, misconceptions, and readiness to engage with the content.
B. Post-lesson Evaluation:
After teaching the topic, the teacher uses the same 5 MCQs to measure learning gains. This provides insight into how much students have learned and whether the teaching objectives were achieved.
________________________________________
I. Advantages of this Teaching and Assessment Method
1. Easy to Administer and Score:
o MCQs are straightforward and can be graded quickly, even automated if technology is used.
o Saves time compared to essay-type assessments.
2. Quantifiable Learning Gains:
o Comparison of pre- and post-test results offers clear, measurable data on student progress.
o Helps in identifying specific areas where students improved or struggled.
3. Immediate Feedback:
o Teachers and students can quickly see the results, allowing for real-time adjustments to teaching strategies or individual study plans.
4. Broad Content Coverage:
o MCQs can cover a wide range of content in a single test, ensuring comprehensive evaluation.
5. Focuses on Key Concepts:
o Encourages teachers to distill the topic into its most essential elements, making learning more targeted.
________________________________________
II. Disadvantages of this Teaching and Assessment Method
1. Limited Depth of Understanding:
o MCQs often test surface-level knowledge rather than deep comprehension or critical thinking skills.
o They are less effective for evaluating students’ ability to synthesize or apply knowledge.
2. Guessing Can Skew Results:
o Students may guess answers, especially in multiple-choice formats, leading to an inaccurate assessment of their true understanding.
3. Focus on Right/Wrong Answers:
o Does not capture partial understanding or allow students to demonstrate reasoning processes.
4. Potentially Narrow Scope:
o If the 5 MCQs do not comprehensively represent the topic, the evaluation may not reflect students’ true learning outcomes.
5. May Not Address All Learning Objectives:
o Skills like collaboration, creativity, or verbal reasoning are not measurable through MCQs.
________________________________________
C. Analysis of the Teaching Approach
This method of using pre- and post-MCQ evaluations is highly effective for identifying knowledge gaps, quantifying learning gains, and streamlining the assessment process. However, to address its limitations, teachers can combine MCQs with other methods such as group discussions, case studies, or reflective writing. This blended approach would provide a more holistic view of student learning and ensure that all learning objectives are met.

------------------------------------
Example of pre&post lesson evaluation. Test.